The fight against anti-democratic globalism is on, and at the moment it is most visible in the United States where Americanism represented with Donald J. Trump is in a death or life fight with Hillary Clinton’s globalism.
At the moment, if we should believe the opinion polls, we have dark days ahead if we have another Clinton in the White House. Hillary’s warmongering attitudes in Syria and the urge to blame Russians for all the evil in the world could be very dangerous.
A Trump victory will shake George Soros and his globalist puppets to the foundations, but then he would have to defeat the mainstream media who is running the campaign for Hillary.
Before the election, Wikileaks has daily revelations from the corrupt Clinton campaign, and the amount of collusion with the media is very scary. Those of you who believe in an impartial media should take a look at the massive documentation from alternative media.
Below, you can see the email I wrote to Patrick Healy of the New York Times and the central players in the Clinton campaign. You can download the original email I replied to here.
Subject: | Re: Re: Hi Angel and Tina — running stuff by you re Clinton/Trump story in tomorrow’s NYT |
---|---|
Date: | Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:26:36 +0200 |
From: | Kristian Kahrs <kristian@demokratene.no> |
To: | pdh@nytimes.com |
CC: | Jennifer Palmieri <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>, Sara Latham <slatham@hillaryclinton.com>, Christina Reynolds <creynolds@hillaryclinton.com>, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>, Josh Schwerin <jschwerin@hillaryclinton.com>, Brian Fallon <bfallon@hillaryclinton.com>, Nick Merrill <nmerrill@hillaryclinton.com>, Jesse Ferguson <jferguson@hillaryclinton.com> |
Dear Patrick Healy, the unbiased, impartial and righteous national political correspondent for the New York Times, dear Jennifer Palmieri, Sara Latham, Christina Reynolds, John Podesta, Josh Schwerin, Brian Fallon, Nick Merrill and Jesse Ferguson of the Clinton campaign
I read your article Donald Trump Finds Improbable Ally in WikiLeaks, and while I found it interesting, you conveniently seemed to miss the fact that you have been a very important adviser to the Clinton campaign at the same times as you are this independent journalist for the NYT. We can read about your close advising in the Wikileaks Podesta emails, and the feature of download the raw source has been quite useful so that I can just download an eml file and reply to everyone in the email.
So, who am I? Previously, I was a writer for The Associated Press, and thus of course published in the NYT several times, but now I am the Foreign Policy Coordinator for the Democrats in Norway, a national conservative party with a lot in common with European parties like the National Front in France, FPÖ in Austria, AfD in Germany, the Sweden Democrats and the Danish People’s Party. Last night I also wrote an email to Eric Schmidt and John Podesta, and while I do not think Donald J. Trump is perfect, I have endorsed him.
In his videos Stefan Molyneux says we are guilty if we spend our time watching cat videos (I do love cats) instead of confronting the very dangerous globalist takeover in all aspects of our society. Although I am not American, I see how much freedom we can lose the Americans elect HRC as the next commander in chief. We are in the middle of a struggle for Western civilization, and I am willing to fight to the end. While I have been sharing videos on Facebook and Twitter, I also need to step up my game. Therefore, I’d like to publish more stories to my website SorrySerbia.com in English and in Norwegian at demokratene.no. This email will be an article on SorrySerbia.com
Sincerely
Kristian Kahrs
On 29.02.2016 20.22, Jennifer Palmieri wrote:
Brian – think you should talk to him because all the stuff he has about HRC’s thinking is not right and you can knock down. I told Amy that we are not focused on him, leaving that to r’s.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 29, 2016, at 1:48 PM, Sara Latham <slatham@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:
+ John
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Christina Reynolds <creynolds@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:
News to me—as is that last part. To my knowledge, we’ve not gotten to that in planning?
I think the first point is ok, but don’t love pointing to states where we think he’ll do well, unless that’s just a total done deal.
From: Josh Schwerin [mailto:jschwerin@hillaryclinton.com]
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 1:41 PM
To: Jennifer Palmieri <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>; Christina Reynolds <creynolds@hillaryclinton.com>; Brian Fallon <bfallon@hillaryclinton.com>; Nick Merrill <nmerrill@hillaryclinton.com>; Jesse Ferguson <jferguson@hillaryclinton.com>
Cc: Sara Latham <slatham@hillaryclinton.com>
Subject: Fwd: Hi Angel and Tina — running stuff by you re Clinton/Trump story in tomorrow’s NYT
Are we working on this story on our end?
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Angel Urena <Angel@presidentclinton.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:39 PM
Subject: Fwd: Hi Angel and Tina — running stuff by you re Clinton/Trump story in tomorrow’s NYT
To: Synergy <synergy@hillaryclinton.com>
Begin forwarded message:
From: “Healy, Patrick” <pdh@nytimes.com>
Date: February 29, 2016 at 12:36:31 PM CST
To: Angel Urena – PC <angel@presidentclinton.com>, Tina Flournoy <Tina@presidentclinton.com>
Subject: Hi Angel and Tina — running stuff by you re Clinton/Trump story in tomorrow’s NYT
Hi Angel, hi Tina,
Hope you’re both well. Amy Chozick and I are doing a story about how the Clinton campaign and its supporters view Trump as a general election opponent and plan to run against him. The story will run in tomorrow’s paper.
One part of the story deals with how Secretary Clinton, President Clinton, President Obama, and other Dems regard Trump as a potential general election opponent.
I wanted to run some points by you about President Clinton, based on our reporting with allies and campaign advisers and other Dems who have spoken to him.
We’re told that President Clinton (like Mrs. Clinton and some other Dems) thinks that Trump would be a formidable opponent in the general election, and that Dems are in a form of denial if they dismiss Trump as a joke who would be easily defeated in November. President Clinton, like others, thinks that Trump has his finger on the pulse of the electorate’s mood and that only a well-financed, concerted campaign portrayed him as dangerous and bigoted will win what both Clintons believe will be a close November election.
We’re told that President Clinton (like Mrs. Clinton and many other Dems) thinks the single greatest weapon against Trump is Trump’s own instinct to make outrageous, divisive, even hateful comments that can come across as unpresidential. He, Mrs. Clinton, and the campaign all agree that they will need to seize on opportunities to paint Trump as extremist and recklessly impulsive.
We’re told that President Clinton, like Secretary Clinton and some others, think Trump could pose a real threat in battleground states that President Obama carried in 2008 and 2012 — like Virginia and Ohio — and he will be competitive in Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
We’re also told that the campaign intends to unleash President Clinton on social media and the campaign trail when Trump lashes out/tries to sway the news cycle.
Happy to talk this over by email or phone before 6pm today. Thanks, Patrick
—
Patrick Healy
National political correspondent, New York Times
—
Josh Schwerin
Spokesman, Deputy Director of Rapid Response
Hillary for America